Home  
  About  
  Americas  
  Global  
  Iraq  
  Palestine  
  Zionism  
  Stooges  
  Video  
  Blog  
  Links  
  • Brutal bullies
  • Spellbinders
  • Delusional fabrication
  • Invisible men
  • Perfidy, duplicity and deceit
  • Stupid? Or democratically ignorant?
  • Fellow Americans
  • Letter to a rustic American
  • 9/11
  • No one here gets out alive
  • Everything old is new again
  • Bring me the head of Silvino Herrera
  • God, Bush and the bomb
  • Who's the dog? Who's the tail?
  • Beware of the dog!
  • King George
  • The night after
  • Bush squares off with Bolivia and Venezuela over hemispheric model
  • Bolivia's radical realignment under Evo Morales
  • Bolivia's Evo Morales
  • Blowback and globalization
  • Iraq and the American peasant
  • Saint Patrick's Day and missed opportunity
  • Ecuador’s left triumphs at home and prepares to challenge US dominance in South America
  • Of the people
  • Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum
  • The apathetic American
  • Lying about Liberty
  • Landless rural workers confront Brazil’s Lula
  • Round and round we go
  • The new holocaust
  • Voices from the wilderness
  • Miss C.
  • The great deceivers
  • Nuclear hypocrisy in the Middle East
  • Reflections on reality and ideals
  • From sea to shining sea
  • Two knights and a dragon
  • Charges dropped against last of “Los Angeles Eight”
  • The dubious decider
  • No change for me: I want bills
  • US double standard on divestment
  • Don't count on it
  • Sing ‘til the power of the Lord comes down
  • All the baggage, none of the charm
  • Crash and burn
  • A modern tragic hero
  • Politics as usual?
  • Who cares?
  • The real losers
  • Bombs away
  • Evil revisited
  • Obama as icon
  • Obama's missteps
  • Demented morality
  • The rise of food fascism
  • See no evil
  • Obama sweeps “inconvenient” UN resolutions under the carpet
  • A liar’s tale
  • Confronting the right wing rebellion in Bolivia
  • A reason to stay
  • Bail out, Congressman
  • The Night of Tlatelolco
  • The roots of violence
  • Mindsets
  • Campaign rubbish
  • Congratulations Barak Obama, congratulations Americans
  • Barack Obama appoints Israeli as his chief of staff
  • What are we to think of President Barack Obama?
  • Obama’s Trojan Horse
  • Open letter to Mr Barack Obama, US President-elect
  • Rahm Emanuel’s Israeli gate
  • The pacifier’s conflict
  • “The chickens come home to roost”
  • What’s wrong with America?
  • Barack Obama’s chants and choices of change
  • "We control America"
  • Our Bleak House
  • Et Tu, Daniel? The Sandinista Revolution betrayed
  • Obama’s Achilles Heel
  • When the shoe pinches
  • The US has “no moral standing” to criticize Iran
  • This is un-cool, Obama. Best stay home
  • A pressing problem: paranoia and power
  • Aggressive behaviour by any other name
  • What good is America?
  • Obama means no change
  • Was Nuremberg a temporary convenience?
  • Israel’s American visitor to the Gulf
  • Terrorism breeds terrorism
  • Rethinking the costs of peace
  • Mr Abbas goes to Washington
  • Obama’s speech in Cairo: afterthoughts
  • The Uighurs, Guantanamo, Cuba and Palestine
  • “Armchair” killing: a US-Israeli trade-mark
  • America’s arrogant manipulator
  • Honduran coup tries to halt advance of Latin American left
  • Blustering Biden bows to Bibi
  • The world's wicked war of words
  • The case for revisiting Nuremburg
  • The “democracy” that can do no wrong
  • The drama and the farce
  • The recession is over! (Now get off your lazy asses and spend some money, dammit!)
  • Obama should back Goldstone report
  • The Nobel Prize, the Brand and the President
  • No change in USA’s “Mafia principle” – Noam Chomsky
  • America’s deadly game of trick or treat
  • The Zionist con game in America
  • The resistance of the oppressed
  • The Islamophobe quartet of the USA
  • Double trouble haunts the media
  • Pearl Harbour as Japanese blowback
  • Stoking the fires of fear and hatred
  • Should Khalid Shaikh Mohammed go free?
  • Corruption by harlots in elected office
  • The Quiet American
  • Vengeance – the terrorist’s flag
  • Why Martha Coakley lost
  • Stop terrorizing the world
  • My country 'tis of thee – corporatocracy! Of thee I sing
  • What remains must be the truth: 9/11 revisited
  • What locals in USA know – and what the big guys could learn (but won't)
  • Haiti still suffers after the media big boys wrap
  • The standards that double with warriors
  • The Jerusalem “compromise”: Obama still has no stomach to take on Israel
  • Bibi Netanyahu’s babe: kneepad diplomacy lives!
  • Even the New York Times doesn’t believe Netanyahu
  • Words! Words! Words! The shackles that bind the US to Israel
  • Who’s afraid of 9/11 conspiracy theories?
  • When will Israel attack the USA – again?
  • Americans remaining ill-informed is inexcusable
  • The next 9/11 – made in Israel?
  • Iran sanctions and worse
  • From Shas to Hamas: the group behind the “South Park” controversy
  • US website Salem-News under attack for Israel stories
  • Ruled by paranoia: from the Truman to the Bush doctrine
  • Israeli nuclear espionage: the art of keeping America at risk for fun and profit
  • A day in November: will Barack Obama face up to Israel lobby blackmail?
  • Islamophobia and hate crimes
  • Shame behind the silence of America over Israeli crimes
  • Where is the American freedom flotilla?
  • The moral failure of American liberals
  • Israel: strategic ally or liability for the USA?
  • Why they hate America
  • Sometimes they tell me to shut up
  • Guess who wants to kill the internet?
  • Wake up Americans
  • Has “Obamageddon” signed the world's death warrant?
  • The national interest has gone missing in the USA and Israel
  • The Israeli-US love affair
  • The arrogance of American power
     
    The Night of Tlatelolco

    Death of the student movement in Mexico

    By Ernesto Páramo, translated by S. Ashdown

     5 October 2008

    Ernesto Páramo recalls the events of the Night of Tlatelolco – La noche de Tlatelolco – when on 2 October 1968 the US-backed Mexican army and security forces opened fire on student protesters, killing hundreds of innocent civilans and wounding and arresting numerous others.

    The events of the night of Tlatelolco on 2 October 1968 are still concealed, 40 years later, by a cold, dense fog that obscures the identity of a multitude of secondary actors who nevertheless played important roles in the tragedy. The main actors who took the decisions and had direct responsibility for the events that led to the slaughter were the president of the Republic, Gustavo Díaz Ordaz; the interior secretary, Luis Echeverría Álvarez; the head of the Presidential Guard, Luis Gutiérrez Oropeza; the commander of military operation in Tlatelolco, General José Herández Toledo; and the commander of the Olympia Battalion, Colonel Ernesto Gutiérrez Gomes Tagle, among others, along with those who dedicated themselves to sowing confusion as a strategy of disinformation in the days that followed the slaughter. All have remain beyond the reach of law and justice.

    However, the blood of the young people and the tears of the adults are still fresh and painful.

    The massive marches of some 700,000 to 800,000 students, workers, housewives,office workers and peasants that took three to four hours to arrive at the Zócalo from the Anthropology Museum are still present and fresh in the memory of those who participated actively and those who formed a silent cordon along their path, to watch them march and to lend their support.


    2 October 2008: Mexicans mark the Tlatelolco Massacre whose perpetrators are still beyond justice

    Although National Strike Council was not dissolved until 4 December 1968 in a meeting at Zacatenco, the fact is that, after the night of 2 October and the massacre at Tlatelolco, with hundreds of students and spectators killed, thousands locked up in prisons and military camps or persecuted by the state and its repressive forces, the student movement really ceased to exist. Apart from isolated attempts at protest during the Opening Ceremony of the 19th Olympic Games, which were rapidly and brutally suppressed, the movement practically disappeared.

    There are two versions, apparently contradictory, of the events of the night of 2 October, and they depend principally on the place in which the observers could be found, the time in which they made their reports and their personal interpretation under circumstances of extreme danger.

    A public meeting was held with an announced starting time of 5 p.m. at the Plaza de las Tres Culturas, in which a great variety of people could be found: fathers with small children, students, workers and labourers. The speakers demanded in an agitated verbal tone that the violent repression exercised by the different police forces cease, when suddenly the sound of automatic weapons could be heard, from an uncertain direction.

    People began to run, trying to escape in a blind panic, which left many injured.

    During these chaotic moments, snipers situated in the buildings of the Tlatelolco Housing Unit began to shoot against the army units that were there. The time: 6:10 p.m. The battle generally continued that way, with the sound of machine-gun bursts interrupted by long periods of silence, and after the silence, the bursts again.

    The majority of the shots against the army came from the 16 de Septiembre building: the army responded by using two tanks that shot with their cannons toward the building. This resulted immediately in a fire and an unknown number of victims that must have been very large.

    Very soon, there were a number of telephone calls made to the Red Cross and the Green Cross to attend to the victims and bring them to the clinics and hospitals that might offer medical aid. Ambulances made countless trips throughout the night, carrying the wounded.

    In these moments a large number of wounded could be seen, but no dead. The rumour began to circulate that there were two dead soldiers.

    Although the battle took place throughout the entire housing unit, at 7:30 p.m. only two burned trucks could be seen.

    Many onlookers who found themselves at the scene were wounded by gunfire.

    As said previously, there are various versions of the events and how the shooting began. At 7:40 p.m. two of them began to circulate.

    The first said that three helicopters were flying over the site, when suddenly one of them dropped a green light, which was assumed to be the signal for the army to begin its attack.

    The second said that a police patrol passed in front of the 16 de Septiembre building, when it was attacked with firearms, and witnesses insisted that members of the mounted police began to shoot against the inhabitants of the building. Immediately afterward, the army arrived with its tanks, opening fire with its cannons and setting a fire that spread rapidly.

    The speakers made a desperate attempt to control this violent situation, asking those in attendance not to do anything that would provoke a reaction from the army or the police.


    In memorium: scenes from the Tlatelolco Massacre, 2 October 1968

    A helicopter descended low over the Plaza de las Tres Culturas, where the rally was taking place, and dropped a green light. Immediately the gunfire began and the army initiated its operations.

    At 7:15 p.m. the violence reached the most ferocious point. The gunfire ran from Manuel González Street on the north, to Sol Street, which included the entire Tlatelolco Housing Unit.

    Groups of infantry spread everywhere, chasing the students and shooting to kill.

    At 7:15 p.m. a white Volkswagen drove down Manuel González Street at high speed, slowed for a few moments at Glorieta Peralvillo, shot at the soldiers a number of times, and then sped off.

    At 7:45 p.m. at the intersection of Prolongación de San Juan de Letrán and Sol streets, around a hundred students gathered, and a speaker exhorted them through a megaphone to remain united and not fear death.

    Suddenly, a white panelled truck arrived and parked. All the young people dispersed toward the south.

    In Zarco and Nonoalco streets, a bus from the San Rafael-Aviación line could be seen, destroyed. At Guerrero and Nonoalco another, from the Guerrero-San Lázaro line, in flames. At Lerdo and Nonoalco, one from the Paralvillo-Tlanepantla line, also in ruins.

    At 8 p.m. there were harrowing scenes of fathers searching for their children in the vicinity.

    At the Foreign Ministry building, a woman carrying a three-year-old girl could be seen; she took a few steps and fainted.

    At 8:19 p.m. the Army entered the Plaza de las Tres Culturas en masse, with various light combat vehicles and a great number of soldiers. At the same time, approximately 100 students were taken as prisoners to San Juan de Letrán, in 18 military transport vehicles.

    For more than 30 years, the Federal Government has denied the existence of the arrested and missing in the Number One Military Camp. However, official documents from the attorney-general of the republic and the defunct Federal Security Directorate on the repression of 2 October 1968 found in the National General Archive contradict the versions that have prevailed for more than three decades.

    After the army entered the Plaza de las Tres Culturas, a great number of dead could be seen, with bodies piled on top of bodies.

    At 8:45 p.m. a fire began in the Chihuahua building where the army concentrated its fire because it believed that the members of the National Strike Council were there.

    Someone said that there were 17 dead in the courtyard of the Santiago Church.

    The army had captured and taken prisoner 400 students in the area behind the Foreign Ministry building.

    More army reinforcements arrived comprising infantry and other police forces from the Nonoalco Unit. At the Plaza de las Tres Culturas, a military ambulance took away two girls. It is not known if they were seriously wounded.

    Between San Juan de Letrán and Tacuba streets a burning tram could be seen. Between San Juan de Letrán and 16 de Septiembre, a sanitation truck was consumed by fire.

    A witness recalled the arrival of the Olympia Brigade, made up of special agents, many of them so young that they could easily have been confused with the students and who could be identified only by a white glove on their left hands. These soldiers entered all the apartments in the buildings in search of students, weapons or witnesses to the atrocities.

    It was a Dantesque situation, with many fathers, mothers, siblings and other family members searching for their loved ones. They would go from place to place, asking for and trying to find them. They were filled with panic when they realized that some of the buildings had been riddled with automatic weapons by the army, or that the infantry had shot students in the back.

    The other version of the beginning of the massacre says that the rally was almost over when a group of young men who looked like students could be seen passing by. They went to the Chihuahua building, toward a balcony used by the speakers. This group was part of the Olympia Brigade, a special police unit made up of soldiers, judicial police and others. They wore white gloves on their left hands to identify themselves.

    They entered the building and arrived at the balcony where the leaders of the student movement were standing, tried to arrest them and were resisted, so the members of the Olympia Brigade began to shoot after they saw the green light launched from the helicopter that had descended so low. From the Chihuahua building they shot in all directions.

    In the area behind the Tlatelolco church, there were more than a thousand students arrested by the army. Near an elevator bank inside the Chihuahua building 60 students were stripped to their underwear, their faces pointed towards the wall and their hands on their neck.

    At around midnight, some 1,200 detainees could be seen in the eastern part of the Tlatelolco Church. Among them, students, fathers and mothers, labourers, office workers and even children. On all sides, dreadful scenes. Desperate cries of anguish could be heard and, in the darkness, people could be seen searching, frequently in vain, for their missing family members.

    A number of snipers who attacked the army from the Tlatelolco buildings perished or suffered serious injuries. At least two were identified as members of the army.

    As always in Latin America, when there is any kind of political disaster or social tragedy, the CIA can be found hidden nearby, in some hole or other, or in Mexico's case, in the offices of the nation's highest leaders.

    According to documents recently declassified by the United States government, obtained and examined by Kate Doyle at the National Security Archive, in 1956 the CIA began a programme to recruit senior officials of the Mexican government, and in Gustavo Díaz Ordaz and Luis Echeverría Álvarez, it had two very high value agents. Jefferson Morley also analyzed these records and many others, in his book about Winston Scott, Our Man in Mexico.

    Díaz Ordaz, Luis Echeverría and Fernando Gutiérrez Barrios were recruited by Winston Scott, who was chief of station in Mexico between 1956 and 1969, as part of a programme called Litempo, which was so hugely successful that it was considered to be a model for other CIA stations.

    However, the programme ended up being absorbed by its creator, Morley says, noting that the reports on the 1968 student movement only reflected the point of view that the government of Díaz Ordaz wanted to present and that, according to various reports (the CIA sent at least 15 different and contradictory versions of the events at Tlatelolco), the Mexican government was fighting against a communist threat with foreign roots.

    At the end of 1968, sources close to the presidency of Díaz Ordaz accepted without reservation that no-one had the least idea how to resolve the problems of the student movement without endangering the Olympic games, and Díaz Ordaz called Winston Scott so frequently during the most difficult moments of the conflict, to ask for advice and assistance, that the chief of Station left for the United States in order to cut off communication between them.

    The Litempo codename was made up of the prefix Li, which identified Mexican operations and Tempo, which identified the programme of relations between the CIA and "select high government officials" in Mexico.

    Díaz Ordaz was Litempo 2, Echeverría was Litempo 8 and Gutiérrez Barrios was Litempo 4.

    Litempo 1 was Emilio Bolaños, a nephew of Díaz Ordaz who was possibly the conduit by which the CIA made contact with the president, while he was interior secretary.

    According to the document, the CIA in Mexico informed the US government that the Mexican government reported that the student movement was led by communists and that it was under foreign influence (coming from the Soviet Union) but that the reports were a bit exaggerated.

    Like many Mexicans, the officials at the US Embassy in Mexico City were not prepared to acknowledge the strength of the student movement and the violence unleashed by the government of Díaz Ordaz in response. The reports that came out of the embassy throughout the crisis were often confused, possibly because the CIA officials had much closer relations with Mexican politicians than did members of other agencies and were more inclined to believe their political propaganda. For one thing, the embassy had a lot of confidence in the hegemony of the regime. For another, US officials never thought that the students would be capable of mounting a serious challenge to the government.

    In response to the May student protests in Paris, Washington had asked the embassy to prepare a report on the Mexican student-body, but they failed to predict the hurricane that was coming. On 14 June, some five weeks before the first confrontation between the students and security forces, the embassy predicted with total confidence that it was impossible for anything like what had happened in France to happen in Mexico.

    It is also interesting to note that a box found in the Second Gallery of the National General Archive, deposited in the interiors fund, contains telegrams sent to the president in the days that followed October 2, 1968, by politicians, businessmen and leaders of organizations allied with the regime throughout the country.

    In the middle of hundreds of papers one can be found, dated 23 October 1968, from Buenos Aires; its message brief: "Please transmit our adhesion to México is achieved." This message was directed to Luis Echeverría and is signed by José Luis Borges, Manuel Peyrou and Adolfo Bioy Casares. Years later, Borges would confirm beyond any doubt his fascist beliefs and affinities, when he accepted honours for his literary work bestowed by members of the Pinochet military junta in Chile.

    The box of telegrams is preceded by another which contains the agreements that Díaz Ordaz and Luis Echeverría made during the month of October, 1968. However, one can be found that has nothing to do with those. This was sent by Winston Scott, CIA Chief of Station in Mexico, on 19 July 1965, with an invitation to Fernando Gutiérrez Barrios to select two agents from the Federal Security Agency so that on "September 15th" they might travel to the United States to "receive four months of training".


    Ernesto Paramo is a Mexican human rights activist based in the UK. He is co-founder of Tlaxcala, the world network of activist translators, and a regular contributor to activist websites and blogs. A versión of this article originally appeared in Tlaxcala and Rebelión of Spain. Translated by S. Ashdown.



    Copyright © Redress Information & Analysis.
    All rights reserved.