Home  
  About  
  Americas  
  Global  
  Iraq  
  Palestine  
  Zionism  
  Stooges  
  Blog  
  Video  
  Links  
  • Brutal bullies
  • Spellbinders
  • Delusional fabrication
  • Invisible men
  • Perfidy, duplicity and deceit
  • Stupid? Or democratically ignorant?
  • Fellow Americans
  • Letter to a rustic American
  • 9/11
  • No one here gets out alive
  • Everything old is new again
  • Bring me the head of Silvino Herrera
  • God, Bush and the bomb
  • Who's the dog? Who's the tail?
  • Beware of the dog!
  • King George
  • The night after
  • Bush squares off with Bolivia and Venezuela over hemispheric model
  • Bolivia's radical realignment under Evo Morales
  • Bolivia's Evo Morales
  • Blowback and globalization
  • Iraq and the American peasant
  • Saint Patrick's Day and missed opportunity
  • Ecuador’s left triumphs at home and prepares to challenge US dominance in South America
  • Of the people
  • Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum
  • The apathetic American
  • Lying about Liberty
  • Landless rural workers confront Brazil’s Lula
  • Round and round we go
  • The new holocaust
  • Voices from the wilderness
  • Miss C.
  • The great deceivers
  • Nuclear hypocrisy in the Middle East
  • Reflections on reality and ideals
  • From sea to shining sea
  • Two knights and a dragon
  • Charges dropped against last of “Los Angeles Eight”
  • The dubious decider
  • No change for me: I want bills
  • US double standard on divestment
  • Don't count on it
  • Sing ‘til the power of the Lord comes down
  • All the baggage, none of the charm
  • Crash and burn
  • A modern tragic hero
  • Politics as usual?
  • Who cares?
  • The real losers
  • Bombs away
  • Evil revisited
  • Obama as icon
  • Obama's missteps
  • Demented morality
  • The rise of food fascism
  • See no evil
  • Obama sweeps “inconvenient” UN resolutions under the carpet
  • A liar’s tale
  • Confronting the right wing rebellion in Bolivia
  • A reason to stay
  • Bail out, Congressman
  • The Night of Tlatelolco
  • The roots of violence
  • Mindsets
  • Campaign rubbish
  • Congratulations Barak Obama, congratulations Americans
  • Barack Obama appoints Israeli as his chief of staff
  • What are we to think of President Barack Obama?
  • Obama’s Trojan Horse
  • Open letter to Mr Barack Obama, US President-elect
  • Rahm Emanuel’s Israeli gate
  • The pacifier’s conflict
  • “The chickens come home to roost”
  • What’s wrong with America?
  • Barack Obama’s chants and choices of change
  • "We control America"
  • Our Bleak House
  • Et Tu, Daniel? The Sandinista Revolution betrayed
  • Obama’s Achilles Heel
  • When the shoe pinches
  • The US has “no moral standing” to criticize Iran
  • This is un-cool, Obama. Best stay home
  • A pressing problem: paranoia and power
  • Aggressive behaviour by any other name
  • What good is America?
  • Obama means no change
  • Was Nuremberg a temporary convenience?
  • Israel’s American visitor to the Gulf
  • Terrorism breeds terrorism
  • Rethinking the costs of peace
  • Mr Abbas goes to Washington
  • Obama’s speech in Cairo: afterthoughts
  • The Uighurs, Guantanamo, Cuba and Palestine
  • “Armchair” killing: a US-Israeli trade-mark
  • America’s arrogant manipulator
  • Honduran coup tries to halt advance of Latin American left
  • Blustering Biden bows to Bibi
  • The world's wicked war of words
  • The case for revisiting Nuremburg
  • The “democracy” that can do no wrong
  • The drama and the farce
  • The recession is over! (Now get off your lazy asses and spend some money, dammit!)
  • Obama should back Goldstone report
  • The Nobel Prize, the Brand and the President
  • No change in USA’s “Mafia principle” – Noam Chomsky
  • America’s deadly game of trick or treat
  • The Zionist con game in America
  • The resistance of the oppressed
  • The Islamophobe quartet of the USA
  • Double trouble haunts the media
  • Pearl Harbour as Japanese blowback
  • Stoking the fires of fear and hatred
  • Should Khalid Shaikh Mohammed go free?
  • Corruption by harlots in elected office
  • The Quiet American
  • Vengeance – the terrorist’s flag
  • Why Martha Coakley lost
  • Stop terrorizing the world
  • My country 'tis of thee – corporatocracy! Of thee I sing
  • What remains must be the truth: 9/11 revisited
  • What locals in USA know – and what the big guys could learn (but won't)
  • Haiti still suffers after the media big boys wrap
  • The standards that double with warriors
     
    Of the people

    Pro-Israel lobby robs US democracy of meaning

    Paul Balles*

    29 March 2007

    Paul J. Balles argues that pressure by the pro-Israel lobby in the USA has critically undermined US democracy. He calls for a return of the US government to the people.

     

    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke


    Yesterday an Arab friend sent me an email full of photos of Americans holding up signs saying "We're sorry." These were people who felt guilty about what the American government has been doing around the world.

     

    Presumably, their purpose was both to assuage their guilt and to let people outside of America know that not all Americans are warmongers. I also assume that my friend's purpose in sending the photo collection to me was to let me know that not all Arabs think all Americans are as bad as their government.

    Considering what the Bush regime has accomplished in terms of its own carnage and that of its Israeli puppeteer, for my Arab friend to express a view often heard 35 years ago was - under current circumstances - quite generous.
    Much too generous from this American critic's point of view.

    Arabs tend to forget at times that America still lays claim to being a democracy, proud to have embraced Abraham Lincoln's reference to a government "of the people, for the people and by the people". It's no longer any of those things.

    Joel S. Hirschborn recently asked, "When you can no longer trust the elected representatives what happens to American democracy?” His response: "It becomes an oxymoron." An oxymoron is a contradiction in terms, like “military justice" or a "just war".

    Hirschborn added:

    We have arrived at a delusional democracy. Delusional because Americans overwhelmingly cannot admit the painful truth that their limited democracy no longer works for the good of most citizens. Instead, through corruption and dishonesty, our representative democracy has morphed into a plutocracy that serves the wealthy, power elites and corporate masters that control the political system and through that the economic system.1


    If the government is not "for the people", how did it become a plutocracy that serves "the wealthy, power elites and corporate masters"? Could that happen if the government was "of the people"?

    It should be clear from the inaction of a Congress recently voted to represent the electorate's wishes to leave Iraq that the government is not of the people.

    In "An Open Letter to the President… Four and a Half Years Later", Sean Penn wrote:

    …because, in the absence of a competent or brave Congress, of a mobilized citizenry, that level of power lies in your hands, it is you who have misused it to become our country's and our constitution's most devastating enemy. You have broken our country and our hearts. The needless blood on your hands, and therefore, on our own, is drowning the freedom, the security, and the dream that America might have been, once healed of and awakened by, the tragedy of September 11, 2001.2


    When 2 per cent of the American population controls the country, no one can claim that America has a democracy "by the people". The Jewish population in the USA is 2 per cent , and it is represented by the lobbying power of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

    Is it democracy when 2 per cent of the population effectively controls the government and media? This is the democracy that the plutocrats in charge want to impose on other countries.

    According to George Soros, in an article on "Israel, America and AIPAC,” it is a lobby "which strongly affects both the Democratic and the Republican parties. AIPAC's mission is to ensure American support for Israel but in recent years it has overreached itself."3 Later, Soros added, "Any politician who dares to expose AIPAC's influence would incur its wrath; so very few can be expected to do so."

    In an earlier article, Juan Cole made it clear that the AIPAC influence on Congress has been ongoing:

    With regard to the Arab-Israeli conflict, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and a few allies have succeeded in imposing complete censorship on both houses of Congress. No Senator or Representative dares make a speech on the floor of his or her institution critical of Israeli policy, even though the Israeli government often violates international law and UN Security Council resolutions.4


    If AIPAC, representing 2 per cent of the American public controls the American government, how can anyone claim that it's a government "by the people"?

    Some still call it "democracy". Is it a democracy for, of, or by the people when a presidential candidate must humble himself/herself before an AIPAC that yields the power of life or death for his/her candidacy?

    Photographs of ordinary citizens holding placards saying "we're sorry" to the offended, wherever else in the world they may be, achieves little, if anything, but a weak expression of guilt by a dozen or so peaceniks.

    We need to do more. We need to encourage academics like John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt whose study of "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" exposes the influence of lobbyists who represent only a tiny percentage of the population.1

    We need more media voices like Nicholas Kristof's. Recently, in a somewhat surprising article - "Talking about Israel" – in the New York Times,. Kristof bemoans the fact that "There is no serious political debate among either Democrats or Republicans about our policy toward Israelis and Palestinians." His explanation:

    American politicians have learned to muzzle themselves. In the run-up to the 2004 Democratic primaries, Howard Dean said he favoured an “even-handed role” for the U.S. - and was blasted for being hostile to Israel. Likewise, Barack Obama has been scolded for daring to say: “Nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people.”5


    We need to ask our representatives and senators to address the issue of yielding to lobby pressures. We represent much more than the 2 per cent who are putting pressure on them. We need to let our representatives and senators know that we're tired of being sorry throughout much of the rest of the world.

    We need to do more than tell the Arab world - or anyone else - that we’re sorry. We need to return the US government to the people.


     

    Notes

    1. Hirschborn, Joel S, "Democracy Dreaming", Information Clearing House, 03/26/07

    2. Penn, Sean, “An Open Letter to the President...Four and a Half Years Later”, The Huffington Post, 03/24/07

    3. Soros, George, “Israel, America and AIPAC”, New York Review of Books, 04/12/07

    4. Cole, Juan, "AIPAC's Overt and Covert Ops", AntiWar.com, 08/30/04

    5. Mearsheimer & Walt, “The Israeli Lobby and US Foreign Policy”, London Review of Books, 03/23/06

    6. Kristof, Nicholas J, op ed, New York Times, 03/18/07


     
    *Paul Balles is a retired American university professor and freelance writer who has lived in the Middle East for 38 years. For more information, see http://www.pballes.com.



    Copyright © Redress Information & Analysis.
    All rights reserved.