Home  
  About  
  Americas  
  Global  
  Iraq  
  Palestine  
  Zionism  
  Stooges  
  Video  
  Blog  
  Links  
  • Brutal bullies
  • Spellbinders
  • Delusional fabrication
  • Invisible men
  • Perfidy, duplicity and deceit
  • Stupid? Or democratically ignorant?
  • Fellow Americans
  • Letter to a rustic American
  • 9/11
  • No one here gets out alive
  • Everything old is new again
  • Bring me the head of Silvino Herrera
  • God, Bush and the bomb
  • Who's the dog? Who's the tail?
  • Beware of the dog!
  • King George
  • The night after
  • Bush squares off with Bolivia and Venezuela over hemispheric model
  • Bolivia's radical realignment under Evo Morales
  • Bolivia's Evo Morales
  • Blowback and globalization
  • Iraq and the American peasant
  • Saint Patrick's Day and missed opportunity
  • Ecuador’s left triumphs at home and prepares to challenge US dominance in South America
  • Of the people
  • Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum
  • The apathetic American
  • Lying about Liberty
  • Landless rural workers confront Brazil’s Lula
  • Round and round we go
  • The new holocaust
  • Voices from the wilderness
  • Miss C.
  • The great deceivers
  • Nuclear hypocrisy in the Middle East
  • Reflections on reality and ideals
  • From sea to shining sea
  • Two knights and a dragon
  • Charges dropped against last of “Los Angeles Eight”
  • The dubious decider
  • No change for me: I want bills
  • US double standard on divestment
  • Don't count on it
  • Sing ‘til the power of the Lord comes down
  • All the baggage, none of the charm
  • Crash and burn
  • A modern tragic hero
  • Politics as usual?
  • Who cares?
  • The real losers
  • Bombs away
  • Evil revisited
  • Obama as icon
  • Obama's missteps
  • Demented morality
  • The rise of food fascism
  • See no evil
  • Obama sweeps “inconvenient” UN resolutions under the carpet
  • A liar’s tale
  • Confronting the right wing rebellion in Bolivia
  • A reason to stay
  • Bail out, Congressman
  • The Night of Tlatelolco
  • The roots of violence
  • Mindsets
  • Campaign rubbish
  • Congratulations Barak Obama, congratulations Americans
  • Barack Obama appoints Israeli as his chief of staff
  • What are we to think of President Barack Obama?
  • Obama’s Trojan Horse
  • Open letter to Mr Barack Obama, US President-elect
  • Rahm Emanuel’s Israeli gate
  • The pacifier’s conflict
  • “The chickens come home to roost”
  • What’s wrong with America?
  • Barack Obama’s chants and choices of change
  • "We control America"
  • Our Bleak House
  • Et Tu, Daniel? The Sandinista Revolution betrayed
  • Obama’s Achilles Heel
  • When the shoe pinches
  • The US has “no moral standing” to criticize Iran
  • This is un-cool, Obama. Best stay home
  • A pressing problem: paranoia and power
  • Aggressive behaviour by any other name
  • What good is America?
  • Obama means no change
  • Was Nuremberg a temporary convenience?
  • Israel’s American visitor to the Gulf
  • Terrorism breeds terrorism
  • Rethinking the costs of peace
  • Mr Abbas goes to Washington
  • Obama’s speech in Cairo: afterthoughts
  • The Uighurs, Guantanamo, Cuba and Palestine
  • “Armchair” killing: a US-Israeli trade-mark
  • America’s arrogant manipulator
  • Honduran coup tries to halt advance of Latin American left
  • Blustering Biden bows to Bibi
  • The world's wicked war of words
  • The case for revisiting Nuremburg
  • The “democracy” that can do no wrong
  • The drama and the farce
  • The recession is over! (Now get off your lazy asses and spend some money, dammit!)
  • Obama should back Goldstone report
  • The Nobel Prize, the Brand and the President
  • No change in USA’s “Mafia principle” – Noam Chomsky
  • America’s deadly game of trick or treat
  • The Zionist con game in America
  • The resistance of the oppressed
  • The Islamophobe quartet of the USA
  • Double trouble haunts the media
  • Pearl Harbour as Japanese blowback
  • Stoking the fires of fear and hatred
  • Should Khalid Shaikh Mohammed go free?
  • Corruption by harlots in elected office
  • The Quiet American
  • Vengeance – the terrorist’s flag
  • Why Martha Coakley lost
  • Stop terrorizing the world
  • My country 'tis of thee – corporatocracy! Of thee I sing
  • What remains must be the truth: 9/11 revisited
  • What locals in USA know – and what the big guys could learn (but won't)
  • Haiti still suffers after the media big boys wrap
  • The standards that double with warriors
  • The Jerusalem “compromise”: Obama still has no stomach to take on Israel
  • Bibi Netanyahu’s babe: kneepad diplomacy lives!
  • Even the New York Times doesn’t believe Netanyahu
  • Words! Words! Words! The shackles that bind the US to Israel
  • Who’s afraid of 9/11 conspiracy theories?
  • When will Israel attack the USA – again?
  • Americans remaining ill-informed is inexcusable
  • The next 9/11 – made in Israel?
  • Iran sanctions and worse
  • From Shas to Hamas: the group behind the “South Park” controversy
  • US website Salem-News under attack for Israel stories
  • Ruled by paranoia: from the Truman to the Bush doctrine
  • Israeli nuclear espionage: the art of keeping America at risk for fun and profit
  • A day in November: will Barack Obama face up to Israel lobby blackmail?
  • Islamophobia and hate crimes
  • Shame behind the silence of America over Israeli crimes
  • Where is the American freedom flotilla?
  • The moral failure of American liberals
  • Israel: strategic ally or liability for the USA?
  • Why they hate America
  • Sometimes they tell me to shut up
  • Guess who wants to kill the internet?
  • Wake up Americans
  • Has “Obamageddon” signed the world's death warrant?
  • The national interest has gone missing in the USA and Israel
  • The Israeli-US love affair
  • The arrogance of American power
     
    From sea to shining sea

    Destroying academic freedom in the United States


    By Paul J. Balles*

    Paul J. Balles shows how the pro-Israel lobby in the United States is destroying academic freedom by hounding out anyone who dares to criticize Israel or US foreign policy.

    Fire him!

    He had said the wrong thing about the wrong people to the wrong audience. “Fire him,” they said, but not for that reason. “Find something else wrong with him.” His firing had to appear legitimate (no one said this, but the record speaks for itself).

    Ward Churchill, an American university professor, was recently fired by the University of Colorado. They said he had committed:

    ...serious research misconduct, including four counts of falsifying information, two counts of fabricating information, two counts of plagiarizing the works of others, improperly reporting the results of studies, and failing to "comply with established standards regarding author names on publications”. In addition, the committee found him "disrespectful of Indian oral traditions”.

    No one had complained of research misconduct previously, even though accusations had been published against Churchill as early as the 1990s.

    After studying the committee report carefully, Professor Tom Mayer of the University of Colorado found that they had no legitimate basis for their accusations of serious research misconduct.

    What really set off the firestorm against Churchill was an essay he wrote in September 2001 entitled "On the justice of roosting chickens" about the 11 September 2001 attacks, in which he argued that US foreign policies provoked the attacks. It didn't get much attention until 2005, when he was asked to speak about his earlier, controversial paper.

    Following the controversy, the University of Colorado’s interim chancellor, Phil DiStefano, stated, "While Professor Churchill has the constitutional right to express his political views, his essay on 9/11 has outraged and appalled us and the general public."

    The main reason for granting tenure to university professors in America is to guarantee academic freedom. The protection is supposed to guarantee freedom for professors to take unpopular positions. Professor Mayer wrote (before the university decided to fire Churchill):

    If any of the sanctions recommended by the investigating committee are put into effect, it will constitute a stunning blow to academic freedom. Such punishment will show that a prolific, provocative and highly influential thinker can be singled out for entirely political reasons; subjected to an arduous interrogation virtually guaranteed to find problems; and then severed from academic employment.

    American universities have been delivering stunning blows to academic freedom much too often.

    Professor Steven Jones, among many, was relieved of his university post for contending that the World Trade Center Towers were blown up with the explosive thermate.

    Inside Higher Education reports that Professor Norman Finkelstein's tenure bid, while "backed by his department and a college-wide faculty committee”, was denied by the president of DePaul University. Professor Finkelstein, whose parents survived the Holocaust, has been a critic of Israeli policies and what he dubbed the "Holocaust industry".

    Finklestein's difficulty came about as a result of a campaign of interference by Israeli-first Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, who Finklestein had exposed in his book Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, as a fraud and plagiarist.

    About academic tenure denial, James Petras has written that the Israeli lobby AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) has influenced many of these decisions, dealing severe blows to academic freedom:

    Highly qualified candidates with outstanding résumés are denied academic and professional appointments or threatened with loss of tenure or expulsion for the mere reason of criticizing Israel. The cases of Professor Juan Cole’s appointment at Yale and Professor Norman Finkelstein at De Paul University are the most notorious cases. The world-renowned Palestinian American scholar, Edward Said, was persecuted and slandered up to his recent death by the attack hounds of the lobby.

    The same attackers have infested Canadian universities as well. McGill University fired Professor Norman Cornett. According to observers, the underlying reason appears to be that he provided a platform in his classes for both pro- and anti-Israeli comments – too many of the latter.

    Not long ago, a correspondent sent me a petition to sign supporting Dr Nadia Abu Al-Haj's tenure bid at Barnard College, comparing her plight to Norman Finkelstein's targeting by "the Israel lobby forces”.

    Sami al-Arian, a Kuwaiti-born Palestinian, was a respected computer professor at the University of South Florida who tried, however vainly, to communicate the real tragedy of Palestinian Arabs to the US government. But Israel’s lobbyists were enraged by his lessons. In 2003, at the instigation of Attorney-General Ashcroft, he was arrested and charged with conspiring “to murder and maim” outside the United States and with raising money for Islamic Jihad in “Palestine”. He was held for two and a half years in solitary confinement, hobbling half a mile, his hands and feet shackled, merely to talk to his lawyers.

    Based in Philadelphia and headed by anti-Arab propagandist Daniel Pipes, Campus Watch unleashed an Internet firestorm in 2002, when it posted "dossiers" on eight scholars who have had the audacity to criticize US foreign policy and the Israeli occupation. The devastating effect of this type of vilification has included fear in both academics and institutions.

    Academic freedom has been disintegrating in a country where it once was the most sacred of freedoms. A statement on academic freedom made by a colloquium of university presidents at Columbia University defined it as “the freedom of teachers, students and academic institutions to pursue knowledge wherever it may lead, without undue or unreasonable interference”.

    Another useful definition considers academic freedom as "the right of a worker in academic institutions to research and teach their beliefs without their livelihood being placed in jeopardy by those who disagree".

    Ironically, in sentencing the shoe bomber Richard Reid, the judge in pronouncing sentence concluded that Reid hated America's freedom. He said:

    It seems to me you hate the one thing that to us is most precious. You hate our freedom. Our individual freedom... Here, in this society, the very winds carry freedom. They carry it everywhere from sea to shining sea.

    The winds of academia have carried freedom further offshore, no longer everywhere from sea to shining sea.



    *Paul Balles is a retired American university professor and freelance writer who has lived in the Middle East for 38 years. For more information, see http://www.pballes.com.


    Copyright © Redress Information & Analysis.
    All rights reserved.