Home  
  About  
  Americas  
  Global  
  Iraq  
  Palestine  
  Zionism  
  Stooges  
  Blog  
  Video  
  Links  
  • Brutal bullies
  • Spellbinders
  • Delusional fabrication
  • Invisible men
  • Perfidy, duplicity and deceit
  • Stupid? Or democratically ignorant?
  • Fellow Americans
  • Letter to a rustic American
  • 9/11
  • No one here gets out alive
  • Everything old is new again
  • Bring me the head of Silvino Herrera
  • God, Bush and the bomb
  • Who's the dog? Who's the tail?
  • Beware of the dog!
  • King George
  • The night after
  • Bush squares off with Bolivia and Venezuela over hemispheric model
  • Bolivia's radical realignment under Evo Morales
  • Bolivia's Evo Morales
  • Blowback and globalization
  • Iraq and the American peasant
  • Saint Patrick's Day and missed opportunity
  • Ecuador’s left triumphs at home and prepares to challenge US dominance in South America
  • Of the people
  • Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum
  • The apathetic American
  • Lying about Liberty
  • Landless rural workers confront Brazil’s Lula
  • Round and round we go
  • The new holocaust
  • Voices from the wilderness
  • Miss C.
  • The great deceivers
  • Nuclear hypocrisy in the Middle East
  • Reflections on reality and ideals
  • From sea to shining sea
  • Two knights and a dragon
  • Charges dropped against last of “Los Angeles Eight”
  • The dubious decider
  • No change for me: I want bills
  • US double standard on divestment
  • Don't count on it
  • Sing ‘til the power of the Lord comes down
  • All the baggage, none of the charm
  • Crash and burn
  • A modern tragic hero
  • Politics as usual?
  • Who cares?
  • The real losers
  • Bombs away
  • Evil revisited
  • Obama as icon
  • Obama's missteps
  • Demented morality
  • The rise of food fascism
  • See no evil
  • Obama sweeps “inconvenient” UN resolutions under the carpet
  • A liar’s tale
  • Confronting the right wing rebellion in Bolivia
  • A reason to stay
  • Bail out, Congressman
  • The Night of Tlatelolco
  • The roots of violence
  • Mindsets
  • Campaign rubbish
  • Congratulations Barak Obama, congratulations Americans
  • Barack Obama appoints Israeli as his chief of staff
  • What are we to think of President Barack Obama?
  • Obama’s Trojan Horse
  • Open letter to Mr Barack Obama, US President-elect
  • Rahm Emanuel’s Israeli gate
  • The pacifier’s conflict
  • “The chickens come home to roost”
  • What’s wrong with America?
  • Barack Obama’s chants and choices of change
  • "We control America"
  • Our Bleak House
  • Et Tu, Daniel? The Sandinista Revolution betrayed
  • Obama’s Achilles Heel
  • When the shoe pinches
  • The US has “no moral standing” to criticize Iran
  • This is un-cool, Obama. Best stay home
  • A pressing problem: paranoia and power
  • Aggressive behaviour by any other name
  • What good is America?
  • Obama means no change
  • Was Nuremberg a temporary convenience?
  • Israel’s American visitor to the Gulf
  • Terrorism breeds terrorism
  • Rethinking the costs of peace
  • Mr Abbas goes to Washington
  • Obama’s speech in Cairo: afterthoughts
  • The Uighurs, Guantanamo, Cuba and Palestine
  • “Armchair” killing: a US-Israeli trade-mark
  • America’s arrogant manipulator
  • Honduran coup tries to halt advance of Latin American left
  • Blustering Biden bows to Bibi
  • The world's wicked war of words
  • The case for revisiting Nuremburg
  • The “democracy” that can do no wrong
  • The drama and the farce
  • The recession is over! (Now get off your lazy asses and spend some money, dammit!)
  • Obama should back Goldstone report
  • The Nobel Prize, the Brand and the President
  • No change in USA’s “Mafia principle” – Noam Chomsky
  • America’s deadly game of trick or treat
  • The Zionist con game in America
  • The resistance of the oppressed
  • The Islamophobe quartet of the USA
  • Double trouble haunts the media
  • Pearl Harbour as Japanese blowback
  • Stoking the fires of fear and hatred
  • Should Khalid Shaikh Mohammed go free?
  • Corruption by harlots in elected office
  • The Quiet American
  • Vengeance – the terrorist’s flag
  • Why Martha Coakley lost
  • Stop terrorizing the world
  • My country 'tis of thee – corporatocracy! Of thee I sing
  • What remains must be the truth: 9/11 revisited
  • What locals in USA know – and what the big guys could learn (but won't)
  • Haiti still suffers after the media big boys wrap
  • The standards that double with warriors
     
    Rahm Emanuel’s Israeli gate
    By Paul J. Balles

    22 November 2008

    Paul J. Balles considers the racist, anti-Arab comments made by the father of Rahm Israel Emanuel – President-elect Barack Obama’s chief of staff – and asks why these comments are acceptable to the American public whereas if they had been referring to Jews, African Americans or Hispanics they would have caused uproar.

    If Rahm Emanuel's appointment as Obama's chief of staff was bad news, the news about Emanuel's father is even worse.

    According to English-language reports in The Jerusalem Post and The Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Benjamin Emanuel discussed the potential impact of his son’s new position on US-Israeli relations:

    “Obviously he’ll influence the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn’t he? What is he, an Arab? He’s not going to be mopping floors at the White House,” the elder Mr Emanuel told the Israeli daily Ma’ariv.

    Jane Hamsher reported, "Representative Rahm Emanuel, President-elect Barack Obama’s chief of staff, called the president of an Arab-American group today to apologize for comments his father made to an Israeli newspaper."

    Observing the activity stimulated by the Emanuels, Professor Jack Shaheen notes that he has been reading comments on liberal blogs like, "why should Rahm be held responsible for comments he didn't make? Shouldn't Rahm's father be the one apologizing? Those were his words, not Rahm's."
     
    Having thoroughly studied decades of brainwashing of the American public with Hollywood's negative portrayals of Arabs in both film and TV, Professor Shaheen saw immediately just how racist the elder Emanuel's comment was. He noted how vigorously the press would react if the target was NOT Arabs:

    Irrespective of the colour, faith or ethnicity of the parent, if he/she had made a similar comment about blacks, Jews, Asians, Latinos, Catholics, Irish, Italians, or whomever, would not the societal outrage have been three-fold? Would not an apology be expected from the son, but also from the parent? How abhorrent would it sound if the parent had stated:

    “What is he, a black? He's not going to be mopping floors at the White House."

    "What is he, a Jew? He's not going to be mopping floors at the White House."

    "What is he, a Mexican? He's not going to be mopping floors at the White House."

    You get the point of how unacceptable such a statement would be. Yet, why the tolerance of intolerance when it comes to Arabs? Why do they count – in our media and in our country – for less?

    The answer goes back to the exposure that Professor Shaheen has done of the film and TV industries' vilification of Arabs in his books, including Reel Bad Arabs, The TV Arab, and his latest (2008) Guilty: Hollywood's Verdict on Arabs After 9/11.

    In his research of nearly a thousand films from 1896 to the present that included Arab characters or references, Shaheen found that only 12 gave positive depictions, 52 were neutral and some 900 were negative.

    Rahm Emanuel’s father brought his son up as an Israeli-American. Apparently, Emanuel still has dual citizenship. If he is to devote himself to America as a public servant, he should give up his Israeli ties, particularly since he will be in a position to have great influence on the president.

    There should remain some doubt about whether or not Rahm Emanuel, who once served in the Israeli army, can relinquish his ties with Israel. To be an American supporter of Israel has obviously become entirely acceptable politics in Washington.

    One has to go as far as Jonathan Pollard and provide Israel with stolen secrets before getting into trouble. It’s easy to suspect that even Pollard thought he could get away with it, noting the abject devotion of Americans to Israel.

    However, returning to the elder Emanuel’s comment about his son. Even if he apologized for his son’s sake, we need to realize that he knows his son well. No doubt, his observation about Rahm’s loyalty to Israel was an accurate picture of Emanuel family reality.


    Paul J. Balles is a retired American university professor and freelance writer who has lived in the Middle East for many years. For more information, see http://www.pballes.com.



    Copyright © Redress Information & Analysis.
    All rights reserved.