Home  
  About  
  Americas  
  Global  
  Iraq  
  Palestine  
  Zionism  
  Stooges  
  Blog  
  Video  
  Links  
  • Brutal bullies
  • Spellbinders
  • Delusional fabrication
  • Invisible men
  • Perfidy, duplicity and deceit
  • Stupid? Or democratically ignorant?
  • Fellow Americans
  • Letter to a rustic American
  • 9/11
  • No one here gets out alive
  • Everything old is new again
  • Bring me the head of Silvino Herrera
  • God, Bush and the bomb
  • Who's the dog? Who's the tail?
  • Beware of the dog!
  • King George
  • The night after
  • Bush squares off with Bolivia and Venezuela over hemispheric model
  • Bolivia's radical realignment under Evo Morales
  • Bolivia's Evo Morales
  • Blowback and globalization
  • Iraq and the American peasant
  • Saint Patrick's Day and missed opportunity
  • Ecuador’s left triumphs at home and prepares to challenge US dominance in South America
  • Of the people
  • Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum
  • The apathetic American
  • Lying about Liberty
  • Landless rural workers confront Brazil’s Lula
  • Round and round we go
  • The new holocaust
  • Voices from the wilderness
  • Miss C.
  • The great deceivers
  • Nuclear hypocrisy in the Middle East
  • Reflections on reality and ideals
  • From sea to shining sea
  • Two knights and a dragon
  • Charges dropped against last of “Los Angeles Eight”
  • The dubious decider
  • No change for me: I want bills
  • US double standard on divestment
  • Don't count on it
  • Sing ‘til the power of the Lord comes down
  • All the baggage, none of the charm
  • Crash and burn
  • A modern tragic hero
  • Politics as usual?
  • Who cares?
  • The real losers
  • Bombs away
  • Evil revisited
  • Obama as icon
  • Obama's missteps
  • Demented morality
  • The rise of food fascism
  • See no evil
  • Obama sweeps “inconvenient” UN resolutions under the carpet
  • A liar’s tale
  • Confronting the right wing rebellion in Bolivia
  • A reason to stay
  • Bail out, Congressman
  • The Night of Tlatelolco
  • The roots of violence
  • Mindsets
  • Campaign rubbish
  • Congratulations Barak Obama, congratulations Americans
  • Barack Obama appoints Israeli as his chief of staff
  • What are we to think of President Barack Obama?
  • Obama’s Trojan Horse
  • Open letter to Mr Barack Obama, US President-elect
  • Rahm Emanuel’s Israeli gate
  • The pacifier’s conflict
  • “The chickens come home to roost”
  • What’s wrong with America?
  • Barack Obama’s chants and choices of change
  • "We control America"
  • Our Bleak House
  • Et Tu, Daniel? The Sandinista Revolution betrayed
  • Obama’s Achilles Heel
  • When the shoe pinches
  • The US has “no moral standing” to criticize Iran
  • This is un-cool, Obama. Best stay home
  • A pressing problem: paranoia and power
  • Aggressive behaviour by any other name
  • What good is America?
  • Obama means no change
  • Was Nuremberg a temporary convenience?
  • Israel’s American visitor to the Gulf
  • Terrorism breeds terrorism
  • Rethinking the costs of peace
  • Mr Abbas goes to Washington
  • Obama’s speech in Cairo: afterthoughts
  • The Uighurs, Guantanamo, Cuba and Palestine
  • “Armchair” killing: a US-Israeli trade-mark
  • America’s arrogant manipulator
  • Honduran coup tries to halt advance of Latin American left
  • Blustering Biden bows to Bibi
  • The world's wicked war of words
  • The case for revisiting Nuremburg
  • The “democracy” that can do no wrong
  • The drama and the farce
  • The recession is over! (Now get off your lazy asses and spend some money, dammit!)
  • Obama should back Goldstone report
  • The Nobel Prize, the Brand and the President
  • No change in USA’s “Mafia principle” – Noam Chomsky
  • America’s deadly game of trick or treat
  • The Zionist con game in America
  • The resistance of the oppressed
  • The Islamophobe quartet of the USA
  • Double trouble haunts the media
  • Pearl Harbour as Japanese blowback
  • Stoking the fires of fear and hatred
  • Should Khalid Shaikh Mohammed go free?
  • Corruption by harlots in elected office
  • The Quiet American
  • Vengeance – the terrorist’s flag
  • Why Martha Coakley lost
  • Stop terrorizing the world
  • My country 'tis of thee – corporatocracy! Of thee I sing
  • What remains must be the truth: 9/11 revisited
  • What locals in USA know – and what the big guys could learn (but won't)
  • Haiti still suffers after the media big boys wrap
  • The standards that double with warriors
     
    America’s arrogant manipulator

    Israel lobbyist Paul Wolfowitz calls for US interference in Iran

    By Paul J. Balles

    28 June 2009

    "He was like a cock who thought the sun had risen to hear him crow." – George Eliot

    Paul J. Balles cautions against the warmongering growls of Paul Wolfowitz, the architect of the aggression against Iraq and a man of dual loyalty to Israel and the USA, who is now calling for American interference in Iran’s internal affairs.

    The Washington Post published an Op-Ed piece (19 June) by Paul Wolfowitz, the man more responsible than others in the previous US administration for unjustified death and destruction in Iraq.

    Bernard Weiner, writing in the Crisis Papers reveals that in 1992, then-Secretary of Defence Dick Cheney had a strategy report drafted for the Department of Defence, written by Paul Wolfowitz, who was then the under-secretary of defence for policy.
     
    In it, the US government was urged, as the world's sole remaining superpower, to move aggressively and militarily around the globe. The report called for pre-emptive attacks and ad hoc coalitions, but said that the US should be ready to act alone when "collective action cannot be orchestrated."

    Weiner wrote: “Wolfowitz outlined plans for military intervention in Iraq as an action necessary to assure ‘access to vital raw material, primarily Persian Gulf oil’ and to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and threats from terrorism.”

    This last part was the key to the Wolfowitz doctrine. Israel had as its agent provocateur Paul Wolfowitz to justify occupation of Iraq as permanent protection against WMDs.

    "For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on." said Wolfowitz, in an interview in the magazine Vanity Fair.

    In his latest Washington Post article, Wolfowitz started off with a hawkish remark about how, "President Obama's first response to the protests in Iran was silence, followed by a cautious, almost neutral stance designed to avoid 'meddling' in Iranian affairs".

    Instead of criticizing Barack Obama’s prudent response to the events in Iran, the uncompromising warmonger Wolfowitz should be having nightmares over the 1,331,578 Iraqis slaughtered since the US invaded Iraq, and the 4,315 US military personnel sacrificed in that war.

    Wolfowitz now wants Obama to interfere in the election conflict in Iran, an event that's nobody's business but the Iranians’. Other hawks in Washington have undoubtedly been encouraged to call Obama timid or weak. James Mann referred to Wolfowitz as "...the most influential underling in Washington".

    In the Washington Post, Wolfowitz wrote: "...the reform the Iranian demonstrators seek is something that we should be supporting. In such a situation, the United States does not have a 'no comment' option". On the contrary, it’s the only sensible option.

    Wolfowitz added: "Coming from America, silence is itself a comment – a comment in support of those holding power and against those protesting the status quo." This kind of thinking behind America's imperialism has done nothing but breed enemies for America.

    According to Wolfowitz, "It would be a cruel irony if, in an effort to avoid imposing democracy, the United States were to tip the scale toward dictators who impose their will on people struggling for freedom".

    What gives the US a right to "impose democracy" on any country or to decide what should be done about those "who impose their will on people struggling for freedom?"

    Adding insult to injury, Wolfowitz growls: "And if we appear so desperate for negotiations that we will abandon those who support our principles, we weaken our own negotiating hand."
     
    The reality is that Wolfowitz has no interest in negotiations of any sort. He has been called “Wolfowitz of Arabia” in jest by the New York Times’ Maureen Dowd, and, with respect, “the intellectual godfather of the war ... its heart and soul” by Time’s Mark Thompson. If the war on Iraq is anybody’s war, it is Paul Wolfowitz’s.

    It’s past time to end arrogant interference in the name of America.


    Paul J. Balles is a retired American university professor and freelance writer who has lived in the Middle East for many years. For more information, see http://www.pballes.com.

     



    Copyright © Redress Information & Analysis.
    All rights reserved.