Home  
  About  
  Americas  
  Global  
  Palestine  
  Zionism  
  Stooges  
  Video  
  Blog  
  Links  
  • Goodbye to international law
  • A thought police for the internet age: the dangerous cult of the Guardian
  • Suppressing the truth: US and Israeli cover-ups
  • Palestine and Israel: phony peace negotiations or rule of law: which is it to be?
  • “Champion of Israel” in UK Cabinet Liam Fox self-destructs
  • Disgraced former UK Defence Secretary Liam Fox knowingly served Israel
  • No tears for warmonger Liam Fox
  • Still under wraps: crimes and cover-ups waiting for answers
  • Libya between tyranny and an uncertain future
  • Terrorists fight terrorism: America, Israel and the “terrorist” bogeyman
  • The Guardian of Israel
  • Managing Arab expectations of democracy
  • Rendezvous with a British minister on Palestine and Iran
  • Capitalism and the spy market
  • The Arab Spring – hello or goodbye to democracy?
  • UK government spoiling for a fight with Iran
  • The whistleblower as hero
  • Crippling Iran: questions for UK Foreign Secretary William Hague
  • An idiot’s overview of why Western capitalism is crashing
  • Politics and the challenge of perception
  • Iran economic sanctions: the diplomacy of cowards?
  • Syria, the myth of Assad’s popularity and the media of disinformation
  • The ongoing war against truth
  • Democratic elections in the Middle East: why the Islamists win
  • The BBC censors its own report on Tunisia’s Jews saying “No” to Israel!
     
    The pain of Gaza

    Will nothing spur Britain to act?


    By Stuart Littlewood*

    24 January 2008

    Stuart Littlewood considers British Foreign Secretary David Miliband’s weasel words following a pointless meeting with Palestinian “Prime Minister” Salam Fayyad – words that are deliberately devoid of substance and intended to avoid helping starving Gaza.

    While the pain of Gaza was being ratcheted-up unbearably by Israel's blockade, the British foreign secretary, David Miliband, and the “prime minister” of the Palestinian National Authority, Salam Fayyad, met in London to...  er, to do what exactly? To discuss Gaza, we're told.

    We know who Miliband is. He looks like a Boy Scout in long trousers, comes from nowhere and has little real-world experience outside the cosy bubble of politics.

    Fayyad is not so well known to us in the West. His appointment as emergency prime minister is in breach of the Basic Law, but accepting that someone has to fill the void, he’s better than most, judging from his impressive history. However, he has problems enough without the burden of being called a "good fella" by Bush. This, together with his formative years spent at the University of Texas and a career with the World Bank in Washington, invites speculation that Fayyad is Washington's man being groomed to take over as Palestinian quisling supremo when Abbas is elbowed out.
     
    The immediate test for him is how to include Gaza in the peace process when Israel and the West want this thorn in their side excluded or eliminated. His other difficulty is that he has no democratic mandate to speak for the Palestinian people as a whole.
     
    According to the press release that followed their meeting, Mr Miliband said:

    We are absolutely united on the need for the political track to move in step with practical change on the ground. We are of shared views on the need for security on both sides of the border. We have a shared view on the need for economic development for the Palestinian people. We have also discussed the grave situation in Gaza where the humanitarian situation remains one of grave concern. As well as the concern we both have for the security of Israelis suffering rocket attacks.

    Is that it then, David, the sum total of your position on Gaza?
     
    A journalist asked:

    On Hamas itself, the international community won't speak to Hamas. Hamas presumably could halt the firing into Israel if it so wishes. Are there any contacts, including the use of intermediaries with the powers in Gaza, to try to encourage them to change there position?

    Our Boy Scout replied:

    I think it's really important for the international community to take it's cues from the very strong lead given by the Palestinian Authority in this area. President Abbas reminds us that 129 Palestinians were killed last June in an attempted coup against the directly elected Palestinian Authority. I think that it's for the leaders of the Palestinian Authority to work on the process of reconciliation and leadership that is going to be so important. The basic principles set out and shared across the international community are the ones that should be pulling through.

    Gee, thanks Miliband, is that a yes or a no? With innocent people dying in agony every day in Gaza, your woolly response really moves things forward.
     
    My question to you dear boy, had I been in the audience, would have been this: Why don't you personally nip over to Gaza for a chat with Hamas? You would learn something to advantage and undoubtedly have your eyes opened. It could create an honourable turning point. Or is that what you are so desperate to avoid? It might get in the way of plans for Gaza’s total humiliation and Hamas’s annihilation, is that it?
     
    Well, dear boy, the Gazans could teach you and the rest of the cowardly Labour government in Westminster some much-needed lessons in true grit and raw courage.
     
    Meanwhile, not even an impassioned plea from the Heads of Churches in Jerusalem and the Holy Land could spur our Boy Scout and his troop to action. Under the headline “In the name of God, end the siege over Gaza”, their message said:

    One and a half million people imprisoned and without proper food or medicine. Eight hundred thousand without electricity supply; this is illegal collective punishment, an immoral act in violation of the basic human and natural laws as well as international law. It cannot be tolerated anymore. The siege over Gaza should end now.
     
    Voices from our people there say “We feel the threat of being exterminated by this siege."
     
    In the name of God, we, the Heads of Churches in Jerusalem and the Holy Land urge the international community, President Bush and the leaders of Israel, to put an end to this suffering and call upon Israel to activate Prime Minister Salam Fayyad's initiative for Palestinian responsibility control [sic] of the boarders thus ensuring sufficient normal flow of medicine, food, fuel and goods to Gaza. We urge the international community and the European Union to act according to their recent pleas. There is no time to waste when human life is endangered.

    "Act" being the operative word. No more pathetic wringing of hands, please. When is Britain going to act? When indeed are the EU and the United Nations going to act?
     
    Riyad Mansour, the permanent Palestinian observer to the UN, has told the Security Council that the situation is "absolutely untenable" and that "the Israeli policy of brinkmanship is creating a humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip, heightening fears and tensions, inciting, provoking and fuelling the vicious and dreaded cycle of violence."
     
    The Heads of Churches ended their plea with these memorable words:

    With the Prophet we keep praying and hoping;

    "A bruised reed he will not break,  and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out.

    In faithfulness he will bring forth justice;

    He will not falter or be discouraged  till he establishes justice on earth.

    In his law the islands will put their hope." (Isaiah 42:3-4)

    You'd think Israel would have the sense to tread carefully. People around the world recently saw what Israel's brave troops can do against Lebanese women and children, and were shocked. Now we see what they can do, with tanks, armoured bulldozers, F-16 attack jets, helicopter gunships, drones and naval patrol boats, against an already impoverished community squeezed into a tiny sandy strip called Gaza, shut off from their neighbours and equipped only with home-made rockets. Does anyone in Tel Aviv believe the Israel lobbies that have sucked up so successfully to Western governments could survive in the face of mounting public anger and disgust?

    Many must be asking why Britain and others don’t simply send a few warships to land supplies on Gaza's beach? Any retaliation could cost Israel dear. Thirty per cent of Israel's exports go to the EU. All the EU has to do is suspend trade and turn off cooperation, just like Israel switches off the power and blocks Gaza's imports and exports.
     
    We have an old saying in England: "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander."



    *Stuart Littlewood is a businessman-turned-writer from Norfolk, England. He recently published a book entitled Radio Free Palestine about the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. See details on www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk.


    Copyright © Redress Information & Analysis.
    All rights reserved.